E.G'S Refutation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

E.GS Refutation - Essay Examplethis. In order to prove our position, we will be examining both sides of the story, as well as comparing his opinion with others in order to be able to better understand his position. By using the available research and literary productions that is available, in this paper will be able to be proved is the matter of how Gettiers opinion does catch reason. This is what will be dissertated in the following. in that location argon actually many different points that can be used in order to prove Gettiers opinion as being intelligent and basically correct, and several(prenominal) of these in peculiar(prenominal) will be used here. Edmond Gettier is an American philosopher and Professor Emeritus at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, and he is most noted for that of his defence of the principle of deduction for excuse, which was most aptly described in an article which he wrote. In this article, Gettier was incredibly outright in his position, an d he challenges the justified certain belief definition of knowledge, and this definition of knowledge dates as far back as Platos Theaetetus. One of the biggest disputes in regards to Gettiers refutation is the fact that it had already been done, in particular by the work of Wittgenstein at first his account was widely accepted, by most philosophers in fact, however it was the actual validity of his article that was put into question. His disapproval of the Justified True Belief model is definitely systematic, and in his article he provides several incredibly significant and influential examples of beliefs, of which are both rightful(a) and justified. However, although they are - and for the most part always have been - considered as being true and justified, it has yet been considered that we should not classify this as being actual knowledge. There are certain opinions that have been made in regards to Gettiers work, and this includes the fact that Gettiers use of justificatio n is too broad, for example, and that he should not use it overly, as it is considered that only just about kinds of justification count some believe that his examples do not count as justification at all as well, Robert Nozick, who was an American philosopher and professor, suggested in this regards that knowledge short must consist of only justified true belief that is held in such a way that if, say, it turned out to be false, would not have been held. In order to prove the fact that Gettiers work and refutation was actually worthwhile and influencing, we must include the opinion of someone whose views went against his, such as Kwame Anthony Appiah. In Appiahs most noted book, Thinking it Through An Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy, he offers an incredibly thorough introduction to contemporary philosophy, and as well he answers some of the most crucial questions in regards to human existence overall. Appiah, a Princeton philosophy professor, overtly attempts to